And while freedom in well-ordered minds tends toward responsibility and the endeavor to make the best of a chosen course, in the ill-ordered it is likely to become an impulsiveness which is displayed equally in contracting and in breaking off marriage without good cause.The conditions of our time give an easy rein to undisciplined wills, and one index of their activity is the divorce rate.Bad training in childhood is a large factor in this, neglected or spoiled children making bad husbands or wives, and probably furnishing the greater number of the divorced.Common observation seems to show that the latter are seldom people of thoroughly wholesome antecedents.
It may not be amiss to add that personal affection is at tile best an inadequate foundation for marriage.To expect that one person should make another happy or good is requiring too much of human nature.Both parties ought to be subject to some higher idea, in reverence for which they may rise above their own imperfection: there ought to be something in the way of religion in the case.A remark which Goethe made of poetry might well be applied to personal love: "It is a very good companion of life, but in no way competent to guide it " ; and because people have no higher thought to shelter them in disappointment is frequently the reason that marriage proves a failure.
As regards institutional bonds there is of course a great relaxation.
Thus economic interdependence declines with the advance of specialization.
The home industries are mostly gone, and every year more things are bought that used to be made in the house.Little is left but cooking, and that, either as a task of the wife or in the shape of the Domestic Service Question, is so troublesome that many are eager to see it follow the rest.At one time marriage was, for women, about the only way to a respectable maintenance, while to men a good housewife was equally an economic necessity.Now this is true only of the farming population, and less true of them than it used to be in the towns the economic considerations are mostly opposed to married life.
Besides making husband and wife less necessary to each other, these changes tend to make married women restless.Nothing works more for sanity and contentment than a reasonable amount of necessary and absorb ing labor;disciplining the mind and giving one a sense of being of use in the world.
It seems a paradox to say that idleness is exhausting, but there is much truth in it, especially in the case of sensitive and eager spirits.A regular and necessary task rests the will by giving it assurance, while the absence of such a task wearies it by uncertainty and futile choice.Just as a person who follows a trail through the woods will go further with less exertion than one who is finding his way, so we all need a foundation of routine, and the lack of this among women of the richer classes is a chief cause of the restless, exacting, often hysterical, spirit, harassing to its owner and every one else, which tends toward discontent, indiscretion and divorce.
The old traditional subordination on the part of the wife had its uses, like other decaying structures of the past; and however distasteful to modern ideas of freedom, was a factor in holding the family together.For, after all, no social organization can be expected to subsist without some regular system of government.We say that the modern family is a democracy;and this sounds very well; but anarchy is sometimes a more correct description.
A well-ordered democracy has a constitution and laws, prescribing the rights and duties of the various members of the state, and providing a method of determining con--troversies: the family, except as we recognize within reasonable limits the authority of the husband and father, has nothing of the sort.
