The first woman's convention in Albany was held at this time， and we had a kind of protracted meeting for two weeks after. There were several hearings before both branches of the legislature， and a succession of meetings in Association Hall， in which Phillips， Channing， Ernestine L. Rose， Antoinette L. Brown， and Susan B. Anthony took part. Being at the capital of the State， discussion was aroused at every fireside， while the comments of the press were numerous and varied. Every little country paper had something witty or silly to say about the uprising of the "strong-minded." Those editors whose heads were about the size of an apple were the most opposed to the uprising of women， illustrating what Sidney Smith said long ago： "There always was， and there always will be a class of men so small that， if women were educated， there would be nobody left below them." Poor human nature loves to have something to look down upon！
Here is a specimen of the way such editors talked at that time. The Albany Register， in an article on "Woman's Rights in the Legislature，" dated March 7， 1854， says：
"While the feminine propagandists of women's rights confined themselves to the exhibition of short petticoats and long-legged boots， and to the holding of conventions and speech-making in concert rooms， the people were disposed to be amused by them， as they are by the wit of the clown in the circus， or the performances of Punch and Judy on fair days， or the minstrelsy of gentlemen with blackened faces， on banjos， the tambourine， and bones.
But the joke is becoming stale. People are getting cloyed with these performances， and are looking for some healthier and more intellectual amusement. The ludicrous is wearing away， and disgust is taking the place of pleasurable sensations， arising from the novelty of this new phase of hypocrisy and infidel fanaticism.
"People are beginning to inquire how far public sentiment should sanction or tolerate these unsexed women， who would step out from the true sphere of the mother， the wife， and the daughter， and taking upon themselves the duties and the business of men， stalk into the public gaze， and， by engaging in the politics， the rough controversies and trafficking of the world， upheave existing institutions， and overrun all the social relations of life.
"It is a melancholy reflection that， among our American women， who have been educated to better things， there should be found any who are willing to follow the lead of such foreign propagandists as the ringleted， gloved exotic， Ernestine L. Rose. We can understand how such a man as the Rev.
Mr. May， or the sleek-headed Dr. Channing， may be deluded by her into becoming one of her disciples. They are not the first instances of infatuation that may overtake weak-minded men， if they are honest in their devotion to her and her doctrines； nor would they be the first examples of a low ambition that seeks notoriety as a substitute for true fame， if they are dishonest.
Such men there are always， and， honest or dishonest， their true position is that of being tied to the apron strings of some strong-minded woman， and to be exhibited as rare specimens of human wickedness or human weakness and folly. But that one educated American should become her disciple and follow her insane teachings is a marvel."
When we see the abuse and ridicule to which the best of men were subjected for standing on our platform in the early days， we need not wonder that so few have been brave enough to advocate our cause in later years， either in conventions or in the halls of legislation.
After twelve added years of agitation， following the passage of the Property Bill， New York conceded other civil rights to married women. Pending the discussion of these various bills， Susan B. Anthony circulated petitions， both for the civil and political rights of women， throughout the State， traveling in stage coaches， open wagons， and sleighs in all seasons， and on foot， from door to door through towns and cities， doing her uttermost to rouse women to some sense of their natural rights as human beings， and to their civil and political rights as citizens of a republic. And while expending her time， strength， and money to secure these blessings for the women of the State， they would gruffly tell her that they had all the rights they wanted， or rudely shut the door in her face； leaving her to stand outside， petition in hand， treating her with as much contempt as if she was asking alms for herself. None but those who did that work in the early days， for the slaves and the women， can ever know the hardships and humiliations that were endured. But it was done because it was only through petitions朼 power seemingly so inefficient杢hat disfranchised classes could be heard in the State and National councils； hence their importance.
The frivolous objections some women made to our appeals were as exasperating as they were ridiculous. To reply to them politely， at all times， required a divine patience. On one occasion， after addressing the legislature， some of the ladies， in congratulating me， inquired， in a deprecating tone， "What do you do with your children？" "Ladies，" I said， "it takes me no longer to speak， than you to listen； what have you done with your children the two hours you have been sitting here？ But， to answer your question， I never leave my children to go to Saratoga， Washington， Newport， or Europe， or even to come here. They are， at this moment， with a faithful nurse at the Delevan House， and， having accomplished my mission， we shall all return home together."
