They were not as yet very large or well-formed crystals.The proposition he struggled to develop was this, that True Democracy did not mean an equal share in the government, it meant an equal opportunity to share in the government.Men were by nature and in the most various ways unequal.True Democracy aimed only at the removal of artificial inequalities....
It was on the truth of this statement, that men were by nature unequal, that the debate had turned.Prothero was passionately against the idea at that time.It was, he felt, separating himself from Benham more and more.He spoke with a personal bitterness.
And he found his chief ally in a rigorous and voluble Frenchman named Carnac, an aggressive Roman Catholic, who opened his speech by saying that the first aristocrat was the devil, and shocked Prothero by claiming him as probably the only other sound Christian in the room.Several biologists were present, and one tall, fair youth with a wearisome forefinger tried to pin Carnac with questions.
"But you must admit some men are taller than others?""Then the others are broader."
"Some are smaller altogether."
"Nimbler--it's notorious."
"Some of the smaller are less nimble than the others.""Then they have better nightmares.How can you tell?"The biologist was temporarily incapacitated, and the talk went on over his prostrate attempts to rally and protest.
A second biologist seemed to Benham to come nearer the gist of the dispute when he said that they were not discussing the importance of men, but their relative inequalities.Nobody was denying the equal importance of everybody.But there was a virtue of this man and a virtue of that.Nobody could dispute the equal importance of every wheel in a machine, of every atom in the universe.Prothero and Carnac were angry because they thought the denial of absolute equality was a denial of equal importance.That was not so.Every man mattered in his place.But politically, or economically, or intellectually that might be a lowly place....
At this point Carnac interrupted with a whooping and great violence, and a volley of obscure French colloquialisms.
He was understood to convey that the speaker was a Jew, and did not in the least mean what he was saying....
15
The second paper was an altogether maturer and more characteristic production.It was no longer necessary to answer Prothero.
Prothero had been incorporated.And Benham had fairly got away with his great idea.It was evident to White that this paper had been worked over on several occasions since its first composition and that Benham had intended to make it a part of his book.There were corrections in pencil and corrections in a different shade of ink, and there was an unfinished new peroration, that was clearly the latest addition of all.Yet its substance had been there always.
It gave the youth just grown to manhood, but anyhow fully grown.It presented the far-dreaming intellectualist shaped.
Benham had called it ARISTOCRACY.But he was far away by now from political aristocracy.
This time he had not begun with definitions and generalizations, but with a curiously subjective appeal.He had not pretended to be theorizing at large any longer, he was manifestly thinking of his own life and as manifestly he was thinking of life as a matter of difficulty and unexpected thwartings.
"We see life," he wrote, "not only life in the world outside us, but life in our own selves, as an immense choice of possibilities;indeed, for us in particular who have come up here, who are not under any urgent necessity to take this line or that, life is apparently pure choice.It is quite easy to think we are all going to choose the pattern of life we like best and work it out in our own way....And, meanwhile, there is no great hurry....
"I want to begin by saying that choice isn't so easy and so necessary as it seems.We think we are going to choose presently, and in the end we may never choose at all.Choice needs perhaps more energy than we think.The great multitude of older people we can observe in the world outside there, haven't chosen either in the matter of the world outside, where they shall go, what they shall do, what part they shall play, or in the matter of the world within, what they will be and what they are determined they will never be.
They are still in much the same state of suspended choice as we seem to be in, but in the meanwhile THINGS HAPPEN TO THEM.And things are happening to us, things will happen to us, while we still suppose ourselves in the wings waiting to be consulted about the casting of the piece....
"Nevertheless this immense appearance of choice which we get in the undergraduate community here, is not altogether illusion; it is more reality than illusion even if it has not the stable and complete reality it appears to have.And it is more a reality for us than it was for our fathers, and much more a reality now than it was a few centuries ago.The world is more confused and multitudinous than ever it was, the practicable world far wider, and ourselves far less under the pressure of inflexible moulding forces and inevitable necessities than any preceding generations.I want to put very clearly how I see the new world, the present world, the world of novel choice to which our youth and inexperience faces, and I want to define to you a certain selection of choices which I am going to call aristocratic, and to which it is our manifest duty and destiny as the elect and favoured sons of our race to direct ourselves.
