What I have now advanced is admitted by all theologians, as appears from the following axiom of Cardinal Bellarmine, a member of your Society: "General and lawful councils are incapable of error in defining the dogmas of faith;but they may err in questions of fact." In another place he says: "The pope, as pope, and even as the head of a universal council, may err in particular controversies of fact, which depend principally on the information and testimony of men." Cardinal Baronius speaks in the same manner: "Implicit submission is due to the decisions of councils in points of faith; but, in so far as persons and their writings are concerned, the censures which have been pronounced against them have not been so rigourously observed, because there is none who may not chance to be deceived in such matters."I may add that, to prove this point, the Archbishop of Toulouse has deduced the following rule from the letters of two great popes- St.Leon and Pelagius II: "That the proper object of councils is the faith; and whatsoever is determined by them, independently of the faith, may be reviewed and examined anew: whereas nothing ought to be re-examined that has been decided in a matter of faith; because, as Tertullian observes, the rule of faith alone is immovable and irrevocable." Hence it has been seen that, while general and lawful councils have never contradicted one another in points of faith, because, as M.de Toulouse has said, "it is not allowable to examine de novo decisions in matters of faith"; several instances have occurred in which these same councils have disagreed in points of fact, where the discussion turned upon the sense of an author; because, as the same prelate observes, quoting the popes as his authorities, "everything determined in councils, not referring to the faith, may be reviewed and examined de novo." An example of this contrariety was furnished by the fourth and fifth councils, which differed in their interpretation of the same authors.The same thing happened in the case of two popes, about a proposition maintained by certain monks of Scythia.Pope Hormisdas, understanding it in a bad sense, had condemned it; but Pope John II, his successor, upon re-examining the doctrine understood it in a good sense, approved it, and pronounced it to be orthodox.Would you say that for this reason one of these popes was a heretic? And must you not consequently acknowledge that, provided a person condemn the heretical sense which a pope may have ascribed to a book, he is no heretic because he declines condemning that book, while he understands it in a sense which it is certain the pope has not condemned? If this cannot be admitted, one of these popes must have fallen into error.I have been anxious to familiarize you with these discrepancies among Catholics regarding questions of fact, which involve the understanding of the sense of a writer, showing you father against father, pope against pope, and council against council, to lead you from these to other examples of opposition, similar in their nature, but somewhat more disproportioned in respect of the parties concerned.
同类推荐
热门推荐
豪门暖婚之纨绔甜妻
[纨绔女主+强势男主+宠文+幽默+明星]一昔,娱乐圈中鼎鼎有名的著名影后安溪,在红的发紫时竟然意外失踪了。有人说,她个性蛮横刁钻,平日没少得罪人,这是被人暗害了;有人说,她是某个大富翁的地下情人,这是被人给秘密囚禁,夜夜笙歌去了……四方流言彻夜响落大江南北!事实上,她是因不想接管家里企业,这才大闹失踪的。不想,这一逃跑便遇上了她人生中的?煞神?!!!片段一:安溪无措地看着面前这群人,缓缓露出了略含歉意的微笑,刚要来口,便感觉身子跄踉了一下,一股热流便顺着她的衬衫向下滑落,脸上的笑容一时僵在了脸上。只见一个男人似嘲似讽的笑了一下,将一个浮着热气的空杯子放在桌子上,薄唇轻启,“迟到五分钟!”停顿了一下,又说道,“你的衬衫能让我的咖啡入驻,是它的荣幸。”……片段二:在社会上权倾蹈海的苏墨轩围着围裙在厨房里做着饭,某女却坐在真皮沙发上,左手拿着冰激凌,右手拿着遥控器,好不自在悠闲的看着自己拍的电视剧,“老公,明天我要去拍一个微电影,恐怕没法和你去海外出差了!”在厨房的苏墨轩停下了手中的动作,蹙起眉头,“安溪……”他话还未说完,就听安溪继续说道,“不同意的话也可以……”苏墨轩的眉头这才平顺下去,却听到让他足以吐血的话,“老公你在家给我穿女仆装,好不?”………