OF THE REVENUE OF THE SOVEREIGN OR COMMONWEALTHCHAPTER I
Of the Expenses of the Sovereign or CommonwealthPART 1Of the Expense of Defence THE first duty of the sovereign, that of protecting the society from the violence and invasion of other independent societies, can be performed only by means of a military force.
But the expense both of preparing this military force in time of peace, and of employing it in time of war, is very different in the different states of society, in the different periods of improvement.
Among nations of hunters, the lowest and rudest state of society, such as we find it among the native tribes of North America, every man is a warrior as well as a hunter.When he goes to war, either to defend his society or to revenge the injuries which have been done to it by other societies, he maintains himself by his own labour in the same manner as when he lives at home.His society, for in this state of things there is properly neither sovereign nor commonwealth, is at no sort of expense, either to prepare him for the field, or to maintain him while he is in it.
Among nations of shepherds, a more advanced state of society, such as we find it among the Tartars and Arabs, every man is, in the same manner, a warrior.Such nations have commonly no fixed habitation, but live either in tents or in a sort of covered waggons which are easily transported from place to place.
The whole tribe or nation changes its situation according to the different seasons of the year, as well as according to other accidents.When its herds and flocks have consumed the forage of one part of the country, it removes to another, and from that to a third.In the dry season it comes down to the banks of the rivers; in the wet season it retires to the upper country.When such a nation goes to war, the warriors will not trust their herds and flocks to the feeble defence of their old men, their women and children; and their old men, their women and children, will not be left behind without defence and without subsistence.
The whole nation, besides, being accustomed to a wandering life, even in time of peace, easily takes the field in time of war.
Whether it marches as an army, or moves about as a company of herdsmen, the way of life is nearly the same, though the object proposed by it be very different.They all go to war together, therefore, and every one does as well as he can.Among the Tartars, even the women have been frequently known to engage in battle.If they conquer, whatever belongs to the hostile tribe is the recompense of the victory.But if they are vanquished, all is lost, and not only their herds and flocks, but their women and children, become the booty of the conqueror.Even the greater part of those who survive the action are obliged to submit to him for the sake of immediate subsistence.The rest are commonly dissipated and dispersed in the desert.
The ordinary life, the ordinary exercises of a Tartar or Arab, prepare him sufficiently for war.Running, wrestling, cudgel-playing, throwing the javelin, drawing the bow, etc., are the common pastimes of those who live in the open air, and are all of them the images of war.When a Tartar or Arab actually goes to war, he is maintained by his own herds and flocks which he carries with him in the same manner as in peace.His chief or sovereign, for those nations have all chiefs or sovereigns, is at no sort of expense in preparing him for the field; and when he is in it the chance of plunder is the only pay which he either expects or requires.
An army of hunters can seldom exceed two or three hundred men.The precarious subsistence which the chase affords could seldom allow a greater number to keep together for any considerable time.An army of shepherds, on the contrary, may sometimes amount to two or three hundred thousand.As long as nothing stops their progress, as long as they can go on from one district, of which they have consumed the forage, to another which is yet entire, there seems to be scarce any limit to the number who can march on together.A nation of hunters can never be formidable to the civilised nations in their neighbourhood.Anation of shepherds may.Nothing can be more contemptible than an Indian war in North America.Nothing, on the contrary, can be more dreadful than Tartar invasion has frequently been in Asia.
The judgment of Thucydides, that both Europe and Asia could not resist the Scythians united, has been verified by the experience of all ages.The inhabitants of the extensive but defenceless plains of Scythia or Tartary have been frequently united under the dominion of the chief of some conquering horde or clan, and the havoc and devastation of Asia have always signalized their union.The inhabitants of the inhospitable deserts of Arabia, the other great nation of shepherds, have never been united but once;under Mahomet and his immediate successors.Their union, which was more the effect of religious enthusiasm than of conquest, was signalized in the same manner.If the hunting nations of America should ever become shepherds, their neighbourhood would be much more dangerous to the European colonies than it is at present.
In a yet more advanced state of society, among those nations of husbandmen who have little foreign commerce, and no other manufactures but those coarse and household ones which almost every private family prepares for its own use, every man, in the same manner, either is a warrior or easily becomes such.They who live by agriculture generally pass the whole day in the open air, exposed to all the inclemencies of the seasons.The hardiness of their ordinary life prepares them for the fatigues of war, to some of which their necessary occupations bear a great analogy.
The necessary occupation of a ditcher prepares him to work in the trenches, and to fortify a camp as well as to enclose a field.
